Not everyone carrying an axe is a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks don’t generally carry their axes around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence occurred in a town bar in Fontaniva, Italy, the place where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some unsuspecting slots devices after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video streaming websites, where viewers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing down steam, the machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but maybe not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either it was an indication of victory, or a show of friendship towards these specific machines. Whenever coping with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here all the right time to try out the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a lot of money. He’s a laborer and only works every now and then.’ Apparently, this is one worker who keeps their own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally a tremendously man that is quiet. He just moved in really calmly by having an axe and smashed all the machines. There had been a few customers by them during the time and they had been terrified,’ he included.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But jail overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second among these two stories is just a bit more frightening, because the axe was wielded not at the slots, but at a person in the employees at a betting shop in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting store in Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with a few cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or even worse if he did not comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm on the night of the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant because of the tree-chopping weapon.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police https://casinopokies777.com/royalvegas-casino/ referred to as a ‘quantity of cash,’ and also the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven with a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did maybe not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive regarding the scene.
Whose Casino Can It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While each and every of the three licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight on the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one such proposition that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.
The appropriate choice is associated with the concept that neighboring communities is affected by casino projects, but won’t have a chance to vote on whether those casinos should be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, is one of the handful of applicants whom have recommended that all of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that could be located in East Boston, for instance.
It is unfair to the surrounding communities when it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based regarding the impact it would have on many Boston neighborhoods.
‘The Wynn proposal ended up being voted…on in only one community,’ Conley said within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social receive none of the proposed benefits.’
In line with the state laws that produced the chance of three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino designers are needed to negotiate settlement, with arbitration needed in the event that casinos and governments that are localn’t arrived at a resolution by themselves.
Conley has proposed going for a path that is not really outlined in the 2011 casino law when it comes to the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the whole city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while nevertheless giving East Boston veto power over the whole vote. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal, a Boston Globe survey unearthed that six of this eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and an added candidate not responding to the question). Meanwhile, four of ten applicants supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents found that 44% had been in favor of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters back these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii once the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, addititionally there is a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken fully to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the recreations book cookie container after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired premier activities betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a gambling store critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nevertheless accepted the big donation from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing people of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double requirements.
Since Gala Coral Group is one regarding the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the number that is large of outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign directed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the neighborhood roads of his south London Streatham constituency, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to control the number of betting shops.’
‘we understand there was concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily filling up with wagering shops and cash advance organizations that take advantage of our community, as opposed to help us,’ wrote Umunna in a written report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna says?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says a very important factor in public areas and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that is very uncommon for the politician.
Spared for a Technicality
However, fighting back the corner for the Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna stated that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a personal capacity, and was accepted in respect with the rules and precisely declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for company, and for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.
Even though Goulden is no longer a relative mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or not the Conservative Party may just be looking to destroy the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using this type of hard stance against the spread of the industry in their local constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he really believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ reported Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is considered to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this year their office ended up being accused of modifying his Wikipedia page showing evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.